<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Increasing the numbers of female MP&#8217;s</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 31 Oct 2011 09:45:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steve</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-183</link>
		<dc:creator>Steve</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 21:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-183</guid>
		<description>Arthur, your point is about representation, which is a different issue.  I&#039;m talking about leadership.  I want to see male and female leaders and there is no reason why we shouldn&#039;t have both present in the running of our country.  Men don&#039;t have to lead for women.  We are capable.  Representation is more complicated....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur, your point is about representation, which is a different issue.  I&#8217;m talking about leadership.  I want to see male and female leaders and there is no reason why we shouldn&#8217;t have both present in the running of our country.  Men don&#8217;t have to lead for women.  We are capable.  Representation is more complicated&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Christopher fagan</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-161</link>
		<dc:creator>Christopher fagan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 17 May 2010 15:39:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-161</guid>
		<description>Sometimes the women are their worst enemies, take TV advertising, it has not changed a lot as far as the role of women is concerned. 
On their hands and knees cleaning toilets, giving withering looks as another female has apparently not used the correct hair product (you know the one i mean)etc etc.
Two guys dressed as women fighting over a brand of kitchen towel, not two good looking guys that in the right lighting could pass as women but two hairy guys obviously not gay/trannie. Why they dress as a pair of scary housewives is beyond me but it is a bit Little Britain so that is OK. Is it?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes the women are their worst enemies, take TV advertising, it has not changed a lot as far as the role of women is concerned.<br />
On their hands and knees cleaning toilets, giving withering looks as another female has apparently not used the correct hair product (you know the one i mean)etc etc.<br />
Two guys dressed as women fighting over a brand of kitchen towel, not two good looking guys that in the right lighting could pass as women but two hairy guys obviously not gay/trannie. Why they dress as a pair of scary housewives is beyond me but it is a bit Little Britain so that is OK. Is it?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jo Christie-Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-145</link>
		<dc:creator>Jo Christie-Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 14:33:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-145</guid>
		<description>Lee, so glad that you agree re quotas.  I don&#039;t like them instinctively, for the same reasons as you outline, but the only parliaments which have anywhere near decent female participation have used quotas.

I think you&#039;re analysis is spot on, by the way!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, so glad that you agree re quotas.  I don&#8217;t like them instinctively, for the same reasons as you outline, but the only parliaments which have anywhere near decent female participation have used quotas.</p>
<p>I think you&#8217;re analysis is spot on, by the way!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Chalmers</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-144</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Chalmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:57:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-144</guid>
		<description>Alison, see my earlier post on meritocracy. Quotas are probably a good idea, as the shift in perception we need is not going to happen naturally.  Why would it?  I agree that quotas, whilst unpopular and essentially illiberal (assuming the existence of a meritocracy), are required while we do not have such meritocracy. Once we have the role models and great examples of female leaders, we can do away with the quotas and the need for quotas.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Alison, see my earlier post on meritocracy. Quotas are probably a good idea, as the shift in perception we need is not going to happen naturally.  Why would it?  I agree that quotas, whilst unpopular and essentially illiberal (assuming the existence of a meritocracy), are required while we do not have such meritocracy. Once we have the role models and great examples of female leaders, we can do away with the quotas and the need for quotas.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lee Chalmers</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-143</link>
		<dc:creator>Lee Chalmers</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 13:55:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-143</guid>
		<description>Arthur, your point is about representation, which is a different issue.  I&#039;m talking about leadership.  I want to see male and female leaders and there is no reason why we shouldn&#039;t have both present in the running of our country.  Men don&#039;t have to lead for women.  We are capable.  Representation is more complicated....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Arthur, your point is about representation, which is a different issue.  I&#8217;m talking about leadership.  I want to see male and female leaders and there is no reason why we shouldn&#8217;t have both present in the running of our country.  Men don&#8217;t have to lead for women.  We are capable.  Representation is more complicated&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alison Clarke, Women's Views On News</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-142</link>
		<dc:creator>Alison Clarke, Women's Views On News</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 11:06:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-142</guid>
		<description>Lee, I can&#039;t disagree with anything you say but equally that&#039;s why I think we need to introduce a mandatory quota system. We need all women shortlists in winnable seats which have to be imposed on the parties (voluntarism just doesn&#039;t work); we need a 40% quota for women in parliament (as Spain does); and we need a 30% quota for women in the cabinet. At the same time we should introduce a 40% quota system on boards as Norway did. Likely to happen? No. But that&#039;s no reason for us not to start campaigning for it now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Lee, I can&#8217;t disagree with anything you say but equally that&#8217;s why I think we need to introduce a mandatory quota system. We need all women shortlists in winnable seats which have to be imposed on the parties (voluntarism just doesn&#8217;t work); we need a 40% quota for women in parliament (as Spain does); and we need a 30% quota for women in the cabinet. At the same time we should introduce a 40% quota system on boards as Norway did. Likely to happen? No. But that&#8217;s no reason for us not to start campaigning for it now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arthur</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-140</link>
		<dc:creator>Arthur</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 09:08:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-140</guid>
		<description>Isn&#039;t it best to be represented by someone who wants to represent you? I appreciate that the Commons are not representative of the country as a whole but if the people who are there get the laws and conventions of the country right, does it matter which gender or ethnicity they are?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Isn&#8217;t it best to be represented by someone who wants to represent you? I appreciate that the Commons are not representative of the country as a whole but if the people who are there get the laws and conventions of the country right, does it matter which gender or ethnicity they are?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Niklas Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-139</link>
		<dc:creator>Niklas Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 07:45:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-139</guid>
		<description>You make very good points. On 3), Dinti Batstone wrote an excellent post for Lib Dem Voice not long ago: http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-make-politics-fit-womens-lives-not-viceversa-18285.html</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You make very good points. On 3), Dinti Batstone wrote an excellent post for Lib Dem Voice not long ago: <a href="http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-make-politics-fit-womens-lives-not-viceversa-18285.html" rel="nofollow">http://www.libdemvoice.org/opinion-make-politics-fit-womens-lives-not-viceversa-18285.html</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tweets that mention Increasing the numbers of female MP’s -- Topsy.com</title>
		<link>http://www.leechalmers.com/2010/05/14/increasing-the-numbers-of-female-mps/comment-page-1/#comment-137</link>
		<dc:creator>Tweets that mention Increasing the numbers of female MP’s -- Topsy.com</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 14 May 2010 02:33:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.leechalmers.com/?p=311#comment-137</guid>
		<description>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by House Of Twits, Lee Chalmers and HouseofTwitsLib, Missive. Missive said: Lee Chalmers: Increasing the numbers of female MP’s http://bit.ly/a65M5l [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by House Of Twits, Lee Chalmers and HouseofTwitsLib, Missive. Missive said: Lee Chalmers: Increasing the numbers of female MP’s <a href="http://bit.ly/a65M5l" rel="nofollow">http://bit.ly/a65M5l</a> [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

